Vodkapundit offers a revision of the political spectrum.
It did not ring true to me. I agree that the usual labels are wanting. The United States does not have conservatives who want to conserve the status quo. Most people who identify themselves as conservatives desire radical change. Of the self-identified conservatives I know, most are libertarians and want to roll back the New Deal or are religious conservatives who want a more traditional morality, or are both to one extent or another.
The real lens to view this problem is the dual nature of mankind. Each individual is an organism. As the character created by Dostoevsky says, one drop of my fat is more important to me than 100 freezing poor people. My skin ends here and what goes on inside my skin is vastly more important than anything going on outside. Yet, people are social animals and do not live alone. They build societies and institutions. If observed by a scientist they would be called social animals - never found solitary except by necessity.
The norm for human organization is collectivism. The tribe, the clan, the kingdom are all collectivist entities. The nature of a collective is that the individual is viewed as a part of an organic whole. Shakespeare in “Measure for Measure” expressed the best justification of monarchy ever written. Sure the king takes all the production of the nation, but like the stomach, he receives to send out to each organ of the body nourishment befitting their contribution to the body politic. If the nation were a single organism, the sacrifice of any individual to the overall good of the whole would be no more unjust than the sacrifice of a white blood cell in fighting an infection. The organism is the unit of value, not the individual cell that might have to die to preserve the whole.
Viewing a people, a clan or a nation as an organism is a metaphors. At this level we make metaphors to control action; so that saying entity x is metaphorically similar to entity y is to argue that we should treat x as y.
I am an organism. If I got dangerous skin cancer on my arm I might decide to cut off my arm so that I might live. That is how an organism may act. If you view your nation as an organism, you might decide that some group was detrimental to the nation and determine to exterminate it for the survival of the nation.
The fact is that people are the atoms of moral action. Individuals pay the price. My nerves end at the end of my skin. If we simply refuse to literalize metaphors we would have a clearer picture of the moral landscape